In modern industrial production, polyurethane flexible foam play an important role in various fields such as furniture, automotive seats, and shoe insoles. However, the key technical control points for producing high-quality polyurethane flexible foam plastic products cannot be overlooked. Here are several key technical points in the production process:

Control of Toluene Diisocyanate (TDI):

The optimal isomeric ratio of TDI is 80/20. If this ratio is exceeded, it can lead to the formation of large and closed cells in the foam, prolonging the curing time. Particularly in the production of large block low-density foam products, an excessive isomeric ratio can delay heat release, potentially causing the foam center temperature to remain high for a long time, leading to carbonization and even ignition. If the isomeric ratio is too low, the foam product's density and resilience will decrease, and fine cracks may appear on the foam surface, resulting in poor process repeatability.

Addition of External Blowing Agents:

External blowing agents (water) not only reduce the density of the foam but also improve the softness of the product and help remove reaction heat. To prevent center carbonization in the foaming process of large block foam products, a certain amount of water is usually added. However, as the amount of water increases, the amount of catalyst should also increase correspondingly; otherwise, it may prolong the post-curing time of the foam. Generally, for every 5 parts increase in water, 0.2 to 0.5 parts of silicone oil should be added.

Catalyst Ratio:

Organic tin and tertiary amine catalysts are commonly used to control the NCO-OH and NCO-H2O reactions. By adjusting the ratio of different catalysts, the growth of polymer chains and the foaming reaction can be controlled. Under certain product densities, choosing the appropriate catalyst ratio can control the foam's open-cell rate, cell size, and void load value. Increasing the amount of organic tin catalyst can generally produce foams with smaller cell sizes, but excessive use may increase the closed-cell rate. It is necessary to determine the optimal catalyst dosage through experiments to achieve the best performance of foam products.

Foam Stabilizers:

The role of foam stabilizers is to reduce surface tension of the material, making the foam film wall elastic and preventing foam wall rupture until the molecular chain growth and cross-linking reactions lead to material solidification. Therefore, foam stabilizers play a critical role in the production of one-step polyether sponge and must be strictly controlled in usage.

Temperature Control:

The foam generation reaction is highly sensitive to temperature, and changes in material and foaming temperature will affect foaming operations and physical properties. Therefore, temperature control is one of the important conditions to ensure stable foaming processes. The material temperature is generally controlled at 20-25°C.

Stirring Speed and Time:

The stirring speed and time affect the amount of energy input during the foaming process. If stirring is uneven, a large number of bubbles may appear on the foam surface, leading to defects such as cracking. During mixing of Component A, the speed is 1000r/min; after Component B is added to Component A, the high-speed stirring speed is 2800-3500r/min for 5-8 seconds.

In summary, the key technologies for producing polyurethane flexible foam include controlling TDI, adding external blowing agents, adjusting catalyst ratios, using foam stabilizers, temperature control, and controlling stirring speed and time. Proper control of these technical parameters can ensure the production of stable quality and high-performance polyurethane flexible foam plastic products.

Beginners are concerned that if the settling plate is not adjusted properly, the liquid flowing out of the nozzle may cause front surging or back surging, affecting the foaming process. Within two minutes after starting the machine, the reaction speed gradually increases, sometimes requiring adjustments to the settling plate. Adjustments to the settling plate are more critical in low-density and high-moisture-content (MC) formulas.

TDI (Toluene Diisocyanate) flow rate can be calculated to correspond to the scale value, but it is recommended to actually measure the TDI flow rate during the first foaming. Flow rate is too important; if the flow rate is not accurate, everything else will be a mess. It's best to rely on the simplest and most intuitive method of measuring the flow rate.

When mixing powders, the mixed stone powder should be left overnight and production should start the next day. For ingredients containing melamine and stone powder, it is recommended to first mix melamine with polyether for a period of time before adding the stone powder.

Foam machine formulas with long mixing chamber in the machine head or more teeth on the stirring shaft usually have less amine and lower material temperature. Conversely, foam machine formulas with short mixing chamber in the machine head or fewer teeth on the stirring shaft usually have more amine and higher material temperature.

For the same formula, when switching between dual-spray swivel heads and single-spray swivel heads with similar nozzle cross-sectional areas, the requirements for mesh thickness and layers are similar.

For the calibration of minor material flow, one method is to measure the return flow of the minor material, and the other is to calibrate it by dividing the total amount used by the foaming time. When there is a significant difference between the two calibration methods, rely on the data from the second calibration method.

Formulas for high-quality soft foam are usually within an unstable range, such as a low TDI index, low water-to-MC ratio, low T-9 dosage, and low silicone oil dosage.

Polyurethane soft foam plastic is one of the important products in the polyurethane industry. Its production necessarily involves the use of organic amine catalysts, especially organic tertiary amine catalysts. This is because organic tertiary amine catalysts play a significant role in the main reactions of polyurethane foam formation: the reactions of carbon dioxide and molecular polymerization, promoting rapid expansion of reaction mixtures, increased viscosity, and sharp increase in polymer molecular weight. These conditions are essential for the formation of foam bodies, ensuring that soft foam plastics have advantages such as low density, high strength-to-weight ratio, high resilience, and comfort for sitting and lying. There are many types of organic amine catalysts that can be used for polyurethane soft foam plastics. Among them, the highly efficient catalysts recognized by various manufacturers are: triethylene diamine (TDEA) and bis(dimethylaminoethyl) ether (referred to as A1). These are also the most widely used organic amine catalysts in the world today, with the highest consumption among various catalysts.

Due to the molecular structural differences between TDEA and A1 catalysts, there are significant differences in their catalytic performance, particularly in their reactions to carbon dioxide gas and molecular polymerization. If the user does not pay attention to these differences in production, not only will they fail to produce qualified foam products, but it will also be difficult for foam bodies to form. Therefore, understanding and mastering the performance differences between these two catalysts in polyurethane foam production is of great significance. TDEA exists in a solid state under normal conditions, making its application less convenient. In actual production, low molecular weight alcohol compounds are commonly used as solvents, formulated into 33% solutions for ease of use, commonly referred to as A33. On the other hand, A1 is a low-viscosity liquid that can be directly applied. Below is a comparison of the catalytic performance differences between A1 and A33 in the production of polyurethane soft foam plastics.

A33 has a 60% catalytic function for the reaction with carbon dioxide gas and a 40% catalytic function for molecular polymerization. It has a low effective utilization rate of carbon dioxide gas, resulting in lower foaming height and higher foam density. Since most of the catalytic function is used for molecular polymerization reactions, it is easy to produce closed-cell foam bodies, which are stiff with low rebound, and the adjustable range of tin catalysts becomes narrower. To achieve the same catalytic function, the amount used is 33% more than A1. Both the bottom skin and outer skin of the foam body are thicker. Increasing the amount can increase the reaction speed, but the amount of tin catalyst must be reduced accordingly, otherwise closed-cell foam bodies will be produced.

A1 has an 80% catalytic function for the reaction with carbon dioxide gas and a 20% catalytic function for molecular polymerization. It has a high effective utilization rate of carbon dioxide gas, resulting in higher foaming height and lower foam density. Since most of the catalytic function is used for gas generation reactions, it is easy to produce open-cell foam bodies, which are soft with high rebound, and the adjustable range of tin catalysts becomes wider. To achieve the same catalytic function, the amount used is less than A33. Both the bottom skin and outer skin of the foam body are thinner. Increasing the amount can increase the reaction speed, but the amount of tin catalyst must be increased accordingly, otherwise over-foaming and cracking may occur.

In terms of overall performance between TDEA and A1, A1 has a higher comprehensive catalytic performance than triethylene diamine. Its actual application effects are also better, although not as convenient as triethylene diamine in terms of transportation and storage. Currently, the vast majority of mechanical continuous foam production facilities almost exclusively use A1, while all box-type foam production facilities use TDEA. However, this is not absolute. With a clear understanding of the differences between the two and appropriate formulation adjustments, they can be interchangeable and both can produce excellent foam products.

Calculation of foaming distance for continuous foaming machine

Given: Bubble release time for the formula is 108 seconds, conveyor belt speed during foaming is 4.6 meters per minute. Calculate the swinging and trough foaming distances.

Foaming distance when swinging: (108/60) x 4.6 = 8.28 meters

Foaming distance when troughing: [((108-18)/60)] x 4.6 = 6.9 meters

Explanation: For the same formula, continuous foaming machine has a shorter bubble release time than small bubbles. The calculated foaming distance is shorter than the actual foaming distance. This method only provides approximate confirmation of the foaming distance, supporting the adjustment of the settling plate. Troughing: 18" indicates the time in seconds that the raw material stays in the overflow trough.

Calculation of foaming height for continuous foaming machine

Given: Formula flow rate: 80 kilograms per minute for polyether, 20 for white polyether, 60 for TDI, 20 for stone powder, conveyor belt speed 4.5 meters per minute, mold width 1.65 meters, producing foam with a density of 25 kilograms per cubic meter. What is the foaming height in meters?

Total formula weight: 80 + 20 + 60 + 20 = 180 kilograms

Formula volume: 180/25 = 7.2 cubic meters

Base area of conveyor running per minute:

4.5 x 1.65 = 7.425 cubic meters

Foaming height: 7.2/7.425 = 0.97 meters

Explanation: Silicone oil, amine, and tin are not considered here as they offset the amount of carbon dioxide used during the foaming process. Moisture content (MC) is not considered because MC does not increase foam weight when vaporized.

Foaming Daily Operation

Beginners worry that improper adjustment of the settling plate will cause the liquid sprayed from the nozzle to surge forward or backward, affecting foaming. The reaction rate gradually increases within the first two minutes after starting the machine, sometimes requiring corresponding adjustments to the settling plate. Adjustments to the settling plate are more critical in formulas with low density and high MC.

TDI flow rate can be calculated by determining the corresponding scale value for the flow rate, but it is recommended to measure the TDI flow rate during the first foam production. Flow rate is too important; if the flow rate is incorrect, everything else will be a mess. It's best to rely on the simplest and most intuitive method of measuring flow rate.

When powder is being mixed, the mixed stone powder should be left overnight and production should start the next day. For formulations containing melamine and stone powder, it is recommended to first mix the melamine with the polyether for a period of time before adding the stone powder.

Formulas for foam machines with longer mixing chamber or more teeth on the mixing shaft typically have less amine and lower material temperature. Conversely, formulas for foam machines with shorter mixing chamber or fewer teeth on the mixing shaft typically have more amine and higher material temperature.

For the same formula, when switching between dual spray swing heads and single spray swing heads, if the cross-sectional area of the two nozzles is similar, the requirements for the fineness and number of layers of the mesh are similar.

Correction of small material flow rate can be done by measuring the return flow rate of the small material, or by dividing the total usage by the foaming time for correction. When the values obtained from the two correction methods differ significantly, the data from the second correction method should be used.

Formulas for soft foam with better properties are usually in an unstable range, such as lower TDI index, lower water to MC ratio, lower T-9 dosage, and lower silicone oil dosage. Just like in our jobs, there must be effort before reward.

Have you ever wondered how polyurethane plastic foam is formed? In the previous article, we revealed the basic reactions behind it: isocyanates, polyether (or polyester) polyols, and water, all work together to create this magical substance. So, does this mean that in actual production, we only need these three raw materials? The answer is far from it. In our actual production process, in order to more precisely control the reaction rate and produce products with excellent performance, we often need to harness the power of various additives. These additives not only have wide-ranging applications but also can play a huge role in making our production process more efficient and stable.

Surfactants / Silicone Oil

Surfactants, also known as silicone oil, are also called foam stabilizers. In the production process of polyurethane foam, its role is crucial. The basic duty of silicone oil is to reduce the surface tension of the foaming system, thus improving the miscibility between components, adjusting the size of bubbles, controlling the bubble structure, and enhancing foam stability. Furthermore, it also bears the responsibility of preventing foam collapse. Therefore, it can be said that silicone oil plays an indispensable role in the production of polyurethane foam.

Catalysts

Catalysts play a crucial role in the synthesis process of polyurethane, mainly by accelerating the reaction between isocyanates, water, and polyols. This reaction is a typical polymerization reaction. Without the presence of catalysts, this reaction may proceed very slowly or even not at all. Currently, catalysts on the market are mainly divided into two types: amine catalysts and organic metal catalysts. Amine catalysts are compounds based on nitrogen atoms, which can effectively promote the polymerization reaction of polyurethane. Organic metal catalysts, on the other hand, are compounds that particularly affect the reaction between polyols and isocyanates in the formation of polyurethane, usually organotin compounds. The characteristic of these catalysts lies in their ability to precisely control the reaction process, resulting in a more uniform and stable final product.

Blowing Agents

Blowing agents are substances that generate gas during the polyurethane reaction and help form foam. Depending on the way gas is generated, blowing agents are usually divided into chemical blowing agents and physical blowing agents. Chemical blowing agents refer to substances that undergo chemical changes during the reaction, generate gas, and promote foam formation. Many common substances in our daily lives are actually chemical blowing agents, such as water. Physical blowing agents, on the other hand, are substances that generate gas through physical means. For example, dichloromethane (MC) is a common physical blowing agent.

Other Additives

Relying solely on basic raw materials is far from enough to make products have outstanding performance. In order to meet various needs, other additives are cleverly incorporated into the production process, and their roles should not be underestimated. For example, flame retardants can add flame resistance to products, crosslinking agents can enhance their stability, colorants and fillers can give products a more colorful appearance and texture, and various other additives with different functions are also playing their roles. It is these carefully selected additives that comprehensively improve the performance of the products and bring users a better user experience.