For many small-scale enterprises, although the continuous production line of polyurethane flexible foam offers high output, the costs are also very high, and the target market may not require such large quantities. As a result, non-continuous production lines for polyurethane flexible foam have become their preferable choice. The following is an introduction to the non-continuous production line for polyurethane flexible foam:

1. Box Foaming Process Equipment

The box foaming process and equipment have been developed as a new technology to accommodate the needs of small-scale polyurethane foam production facilities. It builds upon laboratory and manual foam production techniques, essentially an upscaled version of laboratory foam methods. This process has gone through three development stages. Initially, all component materials were sequentially weighed and added to a larger container, followed by the addition of TDI. After rapid mixing, the mixture was immediately poured into a large box mold. This method had high labor intensity, emitted high concentrations of toxic gases, and posed significant health risks to operators. Additionally, the splattering of materials during pouring would entrain a large amount of air, leading to the formation of large air bubbles within the foam structure and even causing foam cracking. Furthermore, there was a significant amount of leftover waste, resulting in substantial material waste and high production costs. 

Later on, the process incorporated metering pumps to convey materials to a mixing barrel with an automatically opening bottom. After high-speed mixing, the bottom plate of the mixing barrel would open, and compressed air would swiftly expel the material into the mold for foam expansion. However, this approach suffered from uneven foam pore structures due to the rapid material flow, leading to swirling foam structures and quality issues like crescent-shaped cracks. The third stage of process improvement is the box foaming device that is mostly adopted today. Its fundamental foaming principle is illustrated in Picture

(a) Raw Material Metering and Mixing      (b) Foaming     (c) Foam Rises to Limit Height

1 - Elevatable Material Mixing Barrel; 2 - Assemblable Box Mold; 3 - Floating Box Top Plate; 4 - Foam Body

Picture 1: Schematic Diagram of Box Foaming Principle

The industrial production equipment for box foaming primarily consists of raw material tanks, metering pump units, elevatable mixing barrels, and assemblable wooden box molds. As depicted in the schematic diagram of the box foaming equipment manufactured by Hennecke (Picture 2), the foaming raw materials are stored in tanks and regulated by control devices to attain the required processing temperature range, typically maintained at 23°C ± 3°C. Sequentially, the metering pump injects polyether polyols, catalyst, surfactants, foaming agents, etc., into the mixing barrel for a stirring duration of 30 to 60 minutes. Next, according to the formulation, TDI is introduced, either directly or through an intermediate container with a bottom switch. Immediate mixing follows TDI addition. Depending on the materials and formulation, the stirring speed is usually controlled at 900 to 1000 revolutions per minute (r/min), with a stirring time of 3 to 8 seconds. After stirring, the mixing barrel is swiftly lifted. The lower part of the barrel lacks a bottom and is placed on the mold box's bottom plate upon lowering, utilizing a sealing ring at the barrel's bottom edge to prevent material leakage.

When lifted, the well-mixed slurry can be directly spread and dispersed on the bottom plate of the box mold, allowing natural foam rise. To prevent the formation of a domed surface on the upper part during foaming, an upper mold plate that matches the mold area and allows for upward limit movement is equipped. The mold box primarily comprises rigid wooden panels, with the bottom plate fixed on a movable mold transport carriage. All four side panels are assemblable, featuring quick-opening and closing locking mechanisms. The inner sides of the panels are coated with silicone-based release agents or lined with polyethylene film material to prevent adhesion. After 8 to 10 minutes of forced maturation within the box, the side panels of the mold box are opened, allowing the removal of block-shaped flexible foam. Following an additional 24 hours of maturation, these foam blocks can undergo cutting and other post-processing procedures.

1 - Raw Material Tank; 2 - Metering Pump Unit; 3 - Control Cabinet; 4 - Mixing Barrel with Elevating Device; 5 - Foaming Box; 6 - Foam Finished Product; 7 - Floating Plate

Picture 2: Box Foaming Equipment Manufactured by Hennecke (BFM100/BFM150)

Box foaming process and equipment exhibit characteristics such as simple operation, compact and straightforward equipment structure, low investment, small footprint, and convenient maintenance. These features make it particularly suitable for small enterprises engaged in intermittent production of low-density block foam. However, its drawbacks are also quite evident: lower production efficiency, less favorable production environment, high concentration of emitted toxic gases on-site, necessitating the use of highly effective exhaust and toxic gas purification systems.

To enhance mixing efficiency, some companies have added several vertical and equidistant baffles to the inner walls of the mixing barrel. These baffles, combined with high-speed spiral-type agitators, facilitate high-speed mixing. This approach can to a certain extent reduce laminar flow effects in the mixing liquid and improve mixing efficiency. An example of this is our product, the SAB-BF3302. For the product's appearance and technical specifications, please refer to Picture 3.

Picture 3: Fully Automatic Box Foaming Machine (Sabtech Technology Limited)

This production line comes with both fully automatic computer control and manual control modes. It's suitable for producing flexible polyurethane foam with densities ranging from 10 to 60 kg/cm. Maximum foam output: 180L. Foam height: 1200mm. Mixing power: 7.5kW. Total power: 35kW.

2. Equipment for Open-Cell Foam Preparation

Open-cell polyurethane foam is a functional foam product developed in the 1980s. It possesses a high porosity, a distinct network structure, softness, breathability, and good mechanical strength. It finds wide application as excellent filtration and shock-absorption material in transportation, instrumentation, medical material filtration membranes, and as catalyst carriers in the chemical industry. Filling it into aircraft fuel tanks can suppress oil agitation and reduce the risk of explosions. Impregnating it with ceramic slurry and high-temperature sintering results in a novel open-cell ceramic filter material used in the metallurgical industry.

The preparation of open-cell polyurethane foam involves methods such as steam hydrolysis, alkaline soaking, and explosion. In industrial production, the explosion method is predominantly used. Initially, polyurethane foam of a specific pore size is prepared using the box foaming process. Subsequently, it's placed in dedicated explosion network equipment, filled with explosive gas, and ignited after completely filling the foam body. By utilizing the impact energy and high-temperature heat generated by the explosion parameters, the cell walls of the polyurethane foam are ruptured and fused onto the cell walls, forming a distinct network structure, as shown in Picture 4.

Picture 4: Clearly Networked Open-Cell Foam

Methods like steam hydrolysis or alkaline soaking are used to prepare open-cell foam. However, there are issues of low efficiency, poor quality, and environmental pollution with these methods. They are mainly employed for small-scale production such as laboratory sample testing. Large-scale production primarily uses the explosion method.

ATL Schubs GmbH, a German company, specializes in the research and development of polyurethane reticulated foam and manufactures the ReticulatusTM foam explosion machinery. The explosion chamber of the reticulated foam explosion equipment comes in two forms: cylindrical and rectangular. The former is suitable for cylindrical foam, while the latter is more versatile. It can be used not only for square foam but also for processing reticulated foam from cylindrical foam, as shown in Picture 5. The explosion chamber is constructed from high-quality 100mm-thick steel plates. Operation is controlled by a computer modem, offering features like automatic opening and closing, automatic locking, automatic operation, and automatic alerts. Additionally, remote program design and modification can be facilitated through data transmission sensors.

Picture 5: Polyurethane Foam Reticulation Processing Equipment (ATL Schubs)

During production, foam bodies measuring 3 to 6 meters in length that are intended for reticulation are pushed into the explosion chamber. The chamber's door is closed hydraulically, and the air inside the chamber is evacuated using a vacuum pump. Under computer control, a precise proportion of oxygen and hydrogen gases is introduced, and the gas mixture's ratio is mechanically adjusted based on factors such as foam sample type and network size requirements. 

Sensors continuously monitor the process, ensuring that all process parameters are within the specified conditions before controlled detonation is initiated. The explosive force and flame intensity generated by the explosion penetrate through the entire foam body, creating a distinct network structure. After forming, the foam body is cooled, residual materials and waste gases are purged using nitrogen, and the pressure chamber can then be opened to retrieve the reticulated foam. The entire process takes approximately 8 to 10 minutes. The pore diameter of the reticulated foam falls within the range of 10 to 100 pores per inch (ppi) (Note: ppi refers to the number of pores within one inch).

The above provides some insight into the non-continuous production process of polyurethane flexible foam. I hope this information proves helpful to you.

Foam scorching is a common phenomenon encountered in actual foam production. Below are the reasons behind this issue along with potential solutions:

(1) Issues with the quality of polyether polyols: During production and transportation, the product's water content exceeds the standard, there is an excess of peroxides and low-boiling-point impurities, the concentration of metal ions is too high, and there is improper selection and concentration of antioxidants.

(2) Formulation: In low-density formulations, the TDI index is too high, the proportion of water to physical blowing agents in the foaming agent is improper, the amount of physical blowing agent is insufficient, and there is excessive water content.

(3) Climate impact: In summer, high temperatures lead to slow heat dissipation, high material temperatures, high air humidity, and the temperature at the reaction center exceeds the antioxidant temperature.

(4) Improper storage: When the TDI index increases, the accumulated heat energy during post-maturation causes an increase in internal temperature, leading to scorching.

In annual fire incidents, a significant proportion of ignitions are caused by foam, including sofa fires and various ignitions from soft packaging. These incidents occur far too frequently. How can we fundamentally eliminate or reduce such events?

One effective approach is to start from the source materials, much like treating the root cause of an illness. Adding flame retardants to polyurethane foam can effectively prevent ignition.

Now, let's understand flame-retardant foam:

Flame-retardant foam, also known as fire-resistant foam, has a chemical name of polyurethane foam material, which is divided into soft foam (mainly used for furniture) and rigid foam (mainly used for insulation). Generally, it is a fireproof material synthesized by adding various flame retardants to polyurethane.

The product's fire-retardant effect meets the requirements of ASTM Standard 117 and national standards. The usage method is the same as regular foam.

The combustion of polymers is a very complex and intense oxidation reaction. The process occurs as the polymer is continuously heated by an external heat source, initiating a free radical chain reaction with oxygen in the air. This releases some heat, further intensifying the degradation of the polymer, generating more flammable gases, and making the combustion more severe.

There are two methods for the flame retardancy of fire-resistant foam:

One is to chemically introduce flame-retardant elements or groups containing flame-retardant new elements into the molecular structure of the foam. The other method is to add compounds containing flame-retardant elements to the foam. The former method uses flame-retardant substances called reactive flame retardants, while the latter method uses substances called additive flame retardants.

Currently, the vast majority of flame retardants used in foam are additive flame retardants, while reactive flame retardants are mainly used in thermosetting resins such as epoxy resins and polyurethanes. The primary function of flame retardants is to interfere with the three basic elements required for combustion: oxygen, heat, and fuel. This can generally be achieved through the following means:

Flame retardants can produce heavier non-flammable gases or boiling liquids that cover the surface of the foam, interrupting the connection between oxidation and fuel.

By absorbing heat through decomposition or sublimation, flame retardants reduce the surface temperature of the polymer.

Flame retardants generate a large amount of non-flammable gases, diluting the concentration of flammable gases and oxygen in the combustion area.

Flame retardants capture radical free radicals, interrupting the chain reaction of oxidation.

The production of block-shaped soft foam typically utilizes the batch foam machine foaming process, a gap-type production method. This method evolved from manual foaming in laboratories. The process involves immediately pouring the mixed reaction materials into an open mold resembling a wooden or metal box, hence the name "boxed foam." The molds (boxes) for boxed foam can be rectangular or cylindrical. To prevent the foam block from forming a domed top, a floating cover plate can be placed on the top of the foam during foaming. The cover plate stays closely attached to the top of the foam and gradually moves upward as the foam rises.

The main equipment for boxed foam production includes: 1) Electric-mechanical stirrer, mixing barrel; 2) Mold box; 3) Weighing tools such as scales, platform scales, measuring cups, glass syringes, and other measuring devices; 4) Stopwatch for controlling mixing time. A small amount of mold release agent is applied to the inner walls of the box to facilitate easy removal of the foam.

The advantages of producing soft foam using the boxed foam method include: low equipment investment, small footprint, simple equipment structure, easy and convenient operation and maintenance, and flexible production. Some small and underfunded domestic and township enterprises use this method to produce polyurethane soft foam. Boxed foam molding is a non-continuous production method for soft foam, so the production efficiency is lower than continuous methods, and the equipment is mostly manually operated, resulting in higher labor intensity. Production capacity is limited, and there is a greater loss in cutting foam plastics. The process parameters for boxed foam should be controlled within a certain range because even with the same formula, the foam properties may not be the same when different process parameters are used. The raw material temperature should be controlled at (25±3) degrees Celsius, mixing speed at 900 to 1000r/min, and mixing time at 5 to 12 seconds. The mixing time of the polyether and additives mixture before adding TDI can be flexibly adjusted depending on the situation, and after adding TDI, a mixing time of 3 to 5 seconds is sufficient, with the key being thorough mixing after TDI addition.

During boxed foam molding, attention should be paid to the following aspects:

1) Prepare before production, including material temperature and machine equipment inspection;

2) Measure as accurately as possible;

3) Control the mixing time appropriately;

4) Pour the mixed material liquid quickly and steadily, avoiding excessive force;

5) Ensure the box is placed steadily, with the bottom paper flat, to avoid uneven material flow during pouring;

6) When the foam rises, gently press the cover to ensure the foam rises smoothly;

7) Additives should be used as specified, and pre-mixed materials should not be left for too long.

Three types of foam equipment have emerged in boxed foam molding. Initially, various raw materials were weighed into a container according to the formula, mixed with a high-speed mixer, and poured into the box mold for foaming and shaping. This method often resulted in residue in the mixing container. An improved method used a metering pump to transport the raw materials to the mixing barrel for uniform mixing. A mechanical device automatically closed the bottom of the barrel, and compressed air was used to press the material into the foaming box for shaping. Both of these methods could create eddies due to the rapid influx of materials into the box, which might cause defects or depressions in the foam products. The most reasonable boxed foam device is to place a bottomless mixing barrel directly in the center of the foaming box. A metering pump delivers the various raw materials needed for foaming into the mixing barrel. After mixing for a few seconds, the lifting device raises the mixing barrel out of the foaming box, allowing the foaming material to flow smoothly over the entire box bottom. This prevents foam cracking due to material eddies, and ensures relatively uniform height throughout the foam.

A pressure device can be added to the expanding foam material to produce flat-topped foam, reducing waste during cutting. This device is suitable for the production of polyether-type polyurethane soft foam and high rebound soft block foam. For polyvinyl acetate polyurethane blocks, this method cannot be used due to the high viscosity of the material, and continuous methods are generally employed.

The internal temperature of foam is as indispensable as vitality is to a person. If the post-cure temperature of the sponge is too low, its physical properties will not be optimal, and there will be significant fluctuations in these properties.

Once the foam is well developed, its internal temperature rapidly rises to over 120 degrees Celsius due to the exothermic reaction occurring under poor heat dissipation conditions, becoming one of the fire hazard risks.

The internal temperature of the foam is crucial for forming its superior properties. Foam matured at specific external temperatures exhibits exceptionally superior physical properties like tensile strength. Some calculate the foam temperature through formulas, while others use software to input formulas and automatically calculate the internal temperature of the foam. So, what factors influence the internal temperature of the foam? Is it significant to know these factors? It's akin to how modern phone cameras are high-resolution, but does that render professional photography useless? Are adjustments like aperture, focal length, and exposure time pointless? To better control things, one must grasp more of the key variables of that thing. Let's start with basic principles to understand the changes in internal foam temperature.

First, let's grasp a few basic rules.

The temperature of a space is directly proportional to the amount of heat energy injected into that space and inversely proportional to its size.

For example, if 10 kilojoules of heat are distributed in an 8-liter space, the temperature of that space is 20 degrees Celsius. If the same 10 kilojoules of heat are distributed in a 4-liter space, the temperature becomes 40 degrees Celsius.

The amount of heat input is directly proportional to the heat input value and the speed of heat input.

For instance, if 100 kilojoules of heat are released at speed "v," the heat input is "A." If the same 100 kilojoules of heat are released at 2v speed, the heat input becomes 2A.

The size of a space is directly proportional to the absolute temperature.

For example, a 1-liter space at 0 degrees Celsius becomes 1.366 liters at 100 degrees Celsius because (273.15 + 100)/(273.15 + 0) = 1.366.

The size of a space is inversely proportional to atmospheric pressure.

The lag in methane vaporization needs to be considered.

Next, let's examine how fine-tuning the formula affects the internal foam temperature.

Since this is fine-tuning, we'll approximate that the surrounding environment remains unchanged before and after the adjustments. Let's consider the effects of adjusting water and methane on the internal foam temperature.

For example, if a formula increases methane by 5%, we can be certain that the internal foam temperature decreases because methane vaporization absorbs heat, reducing the heat input to the foam, and increasing the space to accommodate heat. Similarly, if the water content is increased by 5%, the added water releases heat upon injection into the foam, raising the heat input, and the reaction of the added water generates gas, increasing the space for heat. So, does the internal foam temperature increase or decrease in this case? Experience indicates that the internal foam temperature increases. This suggests that the increased heat input due to this change contributes more to the increase in internal foam temperature than the gas produced by water diluting the temperature.

The changes involving foam index, heat release, and heat dissipation all increasing can make it difficult to intuitively guess whether the internal foam temperature will rise or fall. One might need to insert a probe after foaming to compare internal temperatures or calculate to reach a conclusion.

For calculations, several formulas (algebraic expressions) derived from the earlier basic rules are needed, along with some data: the heat released when water reacts with TDI to form carbon dioxide in kilojoules per mole, the heat absorbed during methane vaporization in kilojoules per mole. To estimate the total foam internal temperature, one must know the heat released when forming amino methyl formate, urea methyl formate, urea, and biuret (polyurea), in kilojoules per mole, and the reaction rate (reaction time).

This also explains why the density calculated from the foam index drastically differs from the theoretical and actual values for foams without fillers at 50 densities. The lower the density, the more closely the theoretical and actual values of foam density match.