The stability of polyurethane soft foam sponge foaming refers to whether the foam breaks, closes pores, collapses, and also includes product hardness, density, elasticity, tensile strength, pore size, and other aspects that meet customer requirements. To achieve these, it is necessary to standardize raw materials, formulations, and operating parameters, and to control the complex and diverse chemical reactions in different environments.

Density: Density is measured in kilograms per cubic meter or grams per cubic centimeter. For irregularly shaped small products, it is not easy to measure the cross-sectional area. One can use graph paper with small squares (such as graph paper with 2-millimeter square sides) to draw the cross-sectional area of the product being measured and calculate the density by counting squares. During the production process, the formulation density, flow rate, conveyor belt speed, and foam width have been determined. Measuring the foam height will reveal the foam density. For example, if a sponge reaches a height of 95 centimeters, the density is 20 kilograms per cubic meter. Density is related to the formulation and is also affected by the reaction rate. There is a density difference between the top and bottom of the same foam.

Hardness: Sponge hardness can be divided into two types. One reflects the surface hardness of the product, used for shoe materials, while the other reflects the overall hardness of the product, used for furniture sponges. The hardness of the foam is related to the hard segments, heat, and raw material content during the reaction, corresponding to the materials TDI, MC, and POP. The hardness of the foam is also affected by the degree of cross-linking. As the density of the sponge decreases, it becomes difficult to increase the amount of POP. For low-density, high-hardness foam, the focus is on how to increase POP and TDI in the formulation to reduce MC. For medium-high-density, high-hardness foam, the focus is on maximizing the hardening effect of POP and TDI.

Elasticity: Elasticity is primarily related to the molecular weight of polyether. The higher the molecular weight, the higher the product's resilience. Secondly, it is related to the formation of side chains during the sponge reaction; the fewer the side chains, the better the elasticity. Reducing the TDI index can reduce the formation of side chains, and reducing the heat inside the foam can also reduce the formation of side chains. However, if there are too few side chains, the tolerance of the formulation is not high, and the foam is not stable. Sponge elasticity is also related to the balance of the formulation. When ordinary foam sponge closes its pores, the elasticity drops sharply. High-hardness foam does not have good elasticity, but foam that is too soft also does not have high resilience.

Tensile Strength: Furniture sponges are mainly used for sitting and leaning, so the tensile strength requirements are not too high. The tensile strength of the sponge is related to the NCO content and cross-linking degree in the meridians. Increasing the TDI index and increasing the heat inside the foam can strengthen the NCO content and cross-linking degree. Increasing MC reduces the increase in tensile strength in many cases. The amount of TDI that a formulation can "accommodate" is related to the foaming method, such as high-pressure machines, low-pressure machines, and manual foaming, which are different. A sponge with a high elongation rate does not necessarily have a high tear strength. For products that emphasize tensile strength, adding a small amount of stone powder can greatly reduce the tensile strength without losing the original.

Pores: Foam with very good pores often becomes mid-to-high-end foam, and the price also rises significantly. Pore formation is a comprehensive problem, and to obtain uniform, delicate, and defect-free pores, one must have a deep understanding of the machinery, raw materials, formulations, and parameters. The formation of pinholes and pockmarks is generally caused by excessive air entrainment in the raw materials during stirring at the machine head or during the movement of the raw materials. It may also result from poor raw material quality or contamination. The theory that air leaks in pipes causing pinholes is not tenable. During foaming, the pressure inside the pipe is higher than the atmospheric pressure outside the pipe. Only the raw material flows out of the pipe, and air from the outside cannot enter.

Polyurethane soft foam plastic is one of the important products in the polyurethane industry. Its production necessarily involves the use of organic amine catalysts, especially organic tertiary amine catalysts. This is because organic tertiary amine catalysts play a significant role in the main reactions of polyurethane foam formation: the reactions of carbon dioxide and molecular polymerization, promoting rapid expansion of reaction mixtures, increased viscosity, and sharp increase in polymer molecular weight. These conditions are essential for the formation of foam bodies, ensuring that soft foam plastics have advantages such as low density, high strength-to-weight ratio, high resilience, and comfort for sitting and lying. There are many types of organic amine catalysts that can be used for polyurethane soft foam plastics. Among them, the highly efficient catalysts recognized by various manufacturers are: triethylene diamine (TDEA) and bis(dimethylaminoethyl) ether (referred to as A1). These are also the most widely used organic amine catalysts in the world today, with the highest consumption among various catalysts.



Due to the molecular structural differences between TDEA and A1 catalysts, there are significant differences in their catalytic performance, particularly in their reactions to carbon dioxide gas and molecular polymerization. If the user does not pay attention to these differences in production, not only will they fail to produce qualified foam products, but it will also be difficult for foam bodies to form. Therefore, understanding and mastering the performance differences between these two catalysts in polyurethane foam production is of great significance. TDEA exists in a solid state under normal conditions, making its application less convenient. In actual production, low molecular weight alcohol compounds are commonly used as solvents, formulated into 33% solutions for ease of use, commonly referred to as A33. On the other hand, A1 is a low-viscosity liquid that can be directly applied. Below is a comparison of the catalytic performance differences between A1 and A33 in the production of polyurethane soft foam plastics.



A33 has a 60% catalytic function for the reaction with carbon dioxide gas and a 40% catalytic function for molecular polymerization. It has a low effective utilization rate of carbon dioxide gas, resulting in lower foaming height and higher foam density. Since most of the catalytic function is used for molecular polymerization reactions, it is easy to produce closed-cell foam bodies, which are stiff with low rebound, and the adjustable range of tin catalysts becomes narrower. To achieve the same catalytic function, the amount used is 33% more than A1. Both the bottom skin and outer skin of the foam body are thicker. Increasing the amount can increase the reaction speed, but the amount of tin catalyst must be reduced accordingly, otherwise closed-cell foam bodies will be produced.



A1 has an 80% catalytic function for the reaction with carbon dioxide gas and a 20% catalytic function for molecular polymerization. It has a high effective utilization rate of carbon dioxide gas, resulting in higher foaming height and lower foam density. Since most of the catalytic function is used for gas generation reactions, it is easy to produce open-cell foam bodies, which are soft with high rebound, and the adjustable range of tin catalysts becomes wider. To achieve the same catalytic function, the amount used is less than A33. Both the bottom skin and outer skin of the foam body are thinner. Increasing the amount can increase the reaction speed, but the amount of tin catalyst must be increased accordingly, otherwise over-foaming and cracking may occur.



In terms of overall performance between TDEA and A1, A1 has a higher comprehensive catalytic performance than triethylene diamine. Its actual application effects are also better, although not as convenient as triethylene diamine in terms of transportation and storage. Currently, the vast majority of mechanical continuous foam production facilities almost exclusively use A1, while all box-type foam production facilities use TDEA. However, this is not absolute. With a clear understanding of the differences between the two and appropriate formulation adjustments, they can be interchangeable and both can produce excellent foam products.

Calculation of foaming distance for continuous foaming machine



Given: Bubble release time for the formula is 108 seconds, conveyor belt speed during foaming is 4.6 meters per minute. Calculate the swinging and trough foaming distances.

Foaming distance when swinging: (108/60) x 4.6 = 8.28 meters

Foaming distance when troughing: [((108-18)/60)] x 4.6 = 6.9 meters



Explanation: For the same formula, continuous foaming machine has a shorter bubble release time than small bubbles. The calculated foaming distance is shorter than the actual foaming distance. This method only provides approximate confirmation of the foaming distance, supporting the adjustment of the settling plate. Troughing: 18" indicates the time in seconds that the raw material stays in the overflow trough.



Calculation of foaming height for continuous foaming machine



Given: Formula flow rate: 80 kilograms per minute for polyether, 20 for white polyether, 60 for TDI, 20 for stone powder, conveyor belt speed 4.5 meters per minute, mold width 1.65 meters, producing foam with a density of 25 kilograms per cubic meter. What is the foaming height in meters?

Total formula weight: 80 + 20 + 60 + 20 = 180 kilograms

Formula volume: 180/25 = 7.2 cubic meters

Base area of conveyor running per minute:

4.5 x 1.65 = 7.425 cubic meters

Foaming height: 7.2/7.425 = 0.97 meters



Explanation: Silicone oil, amine, and tin are not considered here as they offset the amount of carbon dioxide used during the foaming process. Moisture content (MC) is not considered because MC does not increase foam weight when vaporized.



Foaming Daily Operation

Beginners worry that improper adjustment of the settling plate will cause the liquid sprayed from the nozzle to surge forward or backward, affecting foaming. The reaction rate gradually increases within the first two minutes after starting the machine, sometimes requiring corresponding adjustments to the settling plate. Adjustments to the settling plate are more critical in formulas with low density and high MC.

TDI flow rate can be calculated by determining the corresponding scale value for the flow rate, but it is recommended to measure the TDI flow rate during the first foam production. Flow rate is too important; if the flow rate is incorrect, everything else will be a mess. It's best to rely on the simplest and most intuitive method of measuring flow rate.

When powder is being mixed, the mixed stone powder should be left overnight and production should start the next day. For formulations containing melamine and stone powder, it is recommended to first mix the melamine with the polyether for a period of time before adding the stone powder.

Formulas for foam machines with longer mixing chamber or more teeth on the mixing shaft typically have less amine and lower material temperature. Conversely, formulas for foam machines with shorter mixing chamber or fewer teeth on the mixing shaft typically have more amine and higher material temperature.

For the same formula, when switching between dual spray swing heads and single spray swing heads, if the cross-sectional area of the two nozzles is similar, the requirements for the fineness and number of layers of the mesh are similar.

Correction of small material flow rate can be done by measuring the return flow rate of the small material, or by dividing the total usage by the foaming time for correction. When the values obtained from the two correction methods differ significantly, the data from the second correction method should be used.

Formulas for soft foam with better properties are usually in an unstable range, such as lower TDI index, lower water to MC ratio, lower T-9 dosage, and lower silicone oil dosage. Just like in our jobs, there must be effort before reward.

Have you ever wondered how polyurethane plastic foam is formed? In the previous article, we revealed the basic reactions behind it: isocyanates, polyether (or polyester) polyols, and water, all work together to create this magical substance. So, does this mean that in actual production, we only need these three raw materials? The answer is far from it. In our actual production process, in order to more precisely control the reaction rate and produce products with excellent performance, we often need to harness the power of various additives. These additives not only have wide-ranging applications but also can play a huge role in making our production process more efficient and stable.



Surfactants / Silicone Oil

Surfactants, also known as silicone oil, are also called foam stabilizers. In the production process of polyurethane foam, its role is crucial. The basic duty of silicone oil is to reduce the surface tension of the foaming system, thus improving the miscibility between components, adjusting the size of bubbles, controlling the bubble structure, and enhancing foam stability. Furthermore, it also bears the responsibility of preventing foam collapse. Therefore, it can be said that silicone oil plays an indispensable role in the production of polyurethane foam.



Catalysts

Catalysts play a crucial role in the synthesis process of polyurethane, mainly by accelerating the reaction between isocyanates, water, and polyols. This reaction is a typical polymerization reaction. Without the presence of catalysts, this reaction may proceed very slowly or even not at all. Currently, catalysts on the market are mainly divided into two types: amine catalysts and organic metal catalysts. Amine catalysts are compounds based on nitrogen atoms, which can effectively promote the polymerization reaction of polyurethane. Organic metal catalysts, on the other hand, are compounds that particularly affect the reaction between polyols and isocyanates in the formation of polyurethane, usually organotin compounds. The characteristic of these catalysts lies in their ability to precisely control the reaction process, resulting in a more uniform and stable final product.



Blowing Agents

Blowing agents are substances that generate gas during the polyurethane reaction and help form foam. Depending on the way gas is generated, blowing agents are usually divided into chemical blowing agents and physical blowing agents. Chemical blowing agents refer to substances that undergo chemical changes during the reaction, generate gas, and promote foam formation. Many common substances in our daily lives are actually chemical blowing agents, such as water. Physical blowing agents, on the other hand, are substances that generate gas through physical means. For example, dichloromethane (MC) is a common physical blowing agent.



Other Additives

Relying solely on basic raw materials is far from enough to make products have outstanding performance. In order to meet various needs, other additives are cleverly incorporated into the production process, and their roles should not be underestimated. For example, flame retardants can add flame resistance to products, crosslinking agents can enhance their stability, colorants and fillers can give products a more colorful appearance and texture, and various other additives with different functions are also playing their roles. It is these carefully selected additives that comprehensively improve the performance of the products and bring users a better user experience.

Polyurethane flexible foam, also known as sponge, usually undergoes a liquid-to-solid transformation process within two minutes. Compared to other fields of polyurethane, the short and intense reaction time of flexible foam increases the difficulty in achieving fine and orderly cell structure, as well as molecular arrangement.



Research and development (R&D) involve introducing new materials to give products new properties. New materials can be categorized into two types based on their reaction characteristics: one type consists of raw materials that conform to the chemical reactions of polyurethane, such as polyether, isocyanate, silicone oil, and catalysts with different properties and activities. These materials do not fundamentally disrupt the chemical reaction process. The other type includes raw materials (fillers) that do not conform to the chemical reactions of polyurethane, such as adding non-foaming substances like special metal powders, specially formulated inorganic or organic powders with unique properties, ultrafine inorganic powders (with a fineness of over 5000 mesh), special antibacterial agents, etc. These materials sometimes completely disrupt the reaction process, leading to new reaction patterns. Some fillers cause the original formula to collapse completely, while others cause a significant change in the density of the finished product by 30% to 50%. Some fillers drastically alter the rise time of the reaction in the formula, and some fillers cause severe damage to the foam structure after being added.



R&D usually keeps certain raw materials on hand to deal with common problems encountered during the process. These raw materials typically require a wide range of physical and chemical properties. For example, amines such as A33, A-1, A-210, A-230, A-260, 33-LV, CS-90, 9717, and 9727 are commonly used in production but may not all be kept on hand for R&D purposes because their reactivity does not have a fundamental difference. In extensive R&D, the above-mentioned amines can be classified as materials in the same category. For instance, if adding a particular substance causes significant collapse when using A33 for foaming, then the remaining eight types of amines might be deemed ineffective.



One common issue encountered in R&D is foam collapse, which is the least efficient result. It is often said that analyzing and adjusting can only be done effectively once the foam structure is stable. Many cases of foam collapse cannot be resolved by adjusting the formula alone; either the foam properties change drastically, rendering it impractical, or the foam remains unstable. To address this, crosslinking agents are introduced. Crosslinking agents, commonly used as additives in R&D, generally come in two types: linear structured agents, where 1,4-butanediol represents the raw material and urea formation occurs through linear chain growth, and bulk structured agents, such as diethanolamine and glycerol, which are closer to polyether chain growth patterns.



For example, in one R&D case, adjusting the formula could not prevent foam collapse. Experience revealed that strong amine activity caused imbalance. The amine content was reduced from 0.2 parts per hundred polyether to 0.05 parts, and the high cyanate content in the formula seemed odd. The overall reaction rate also slowed significantly with the reduction in amine content, but the collapse persisted. Later, switching to a weaker amine resolved the issue. Hence, sometimes the activity of an amine cannot be compensated for by its concentration alone. It should be noted that the addition of certain substances may result in significant differences in performance between small-scale and large-scale foam production. In such cases, the performance of the last large-scale foam produced should be the main reference point for adjustment.



Sunlight, air, and water—the most ordinary and often overlooked things—are the most precious. Mastering foam production, which seems simple and lacking content at first glance, is actually quite challenging. As a colleague in R&D often says, "I have too little knowledge (one regrets having too little knowledge when it's needed)" and "How long will we keep doing this? (There's pressure)." R&D and learning foam production involve using known points to understand unknown areas, while production and teaching foam production involve using known areas to operate unknown points. Although these two aspects seem similar, bridging the gap between them is quite difficult.