Many factors affect the foaming process and final product quality when manufacturing polyurethane flexible foam. Among these, natural environmental factors such as temperature, air humidity, and atmospheric pressure play crucial roles. These factors significantly influence foam density, hardness, elongation rate, and mechanical strength.

1. Temperature:

Polyurethane foaming reaction is highly sensitive, with temperature being a key control factor. As material temperature rises, the foaming reaction accelerates. In sensitive formulations, excessively high temperatures can pose risks like core burning and ignition. Generally, it's essential to maintain consistent temperatures for polyol and isocyanate components. Increasing temperature leads to a corresponding decrease in foam density during foaming.

Particularly in summer, elevated temperatures increase reaction speed, resulting in decreased foam density and hardness, increased elongation rate, yet enhanced mechanical strength. To counter hardness reduction, adjusting the TDI index is advisable. Manufacturers must adjust process parameters according to seasonal and regional temperature variations to ensure product quality stability. 

2. Air Humidity:

Air humidity also affects the foaming process of polyurethane flexible foam. Higher humidity causes reactions between isocyanate groups in the foam and airborne moisture, leading to reduced product hardness. Increasing TDI dosage during foaming can compensate for this effect. However, excessive humidity can raise curing temperatures, potentially causing core burning. Manufacturers need to carefully adjust foam process formulations and parameters in humid environments to ensure product quality and stability.

3. Atmospheric Pressure:

Atmospheric pressure is another influencing factor, especially in areas at different altitudes. Using the same formulation at higher altitudes results in relatively lower foam product density. This is due to atmospheric pressure variations affecting gas diffusion and expansion during foaming. Manufacturers operating in high-altitude regions should take note of this and may need to adjust formulations or process parameters to meet quality requirements.

In conclusion, natural environmental factors significantly impact the foaming process and final product quality of polyurethane flexible foam. Manufacturers must adjust process parameters based on seasonal, regional, and environmental conditions to ensure stable foam density, hardness, and mechanical strength, meeting customer demands and standards.

1. Core Scorching (Center temperature exceeding material's oxidation temperature)

A. Poor quality polyether polyols: excessive moisture, high peroxide content, high boiling point impurities, elevated metal ion concentration, improper use of antioxidants.

B. Formulation issues: high TDI index in low-density formulas, improper ratio of water to physical blowing agents, insufficient physical blowing agent, excessive water.

C. Climate impact: high summer temperatures, slow heat dissipation, high material temperatures, high humidity leading to center temperature surpassing oxidation temperature.

D. Improper storage: Increased TDI index leading to accumulation of heat during post-curing, resulting in elevated internal temperature and core scorching.

2. Large Compression Deformation

A. Polyether Polyol: Functionality less than 2.5, propylene oxide ratio greater than 8%, high proportion of low molecular weight components, unsaturation greater than 0.05 mol/kg.

B. Process Conditions: The reaction center temperature is too low or too high, poor post-curing, incomplete reaction, or partial scorching.

C. Process Formula: TDI index too low (controlled within 105-108), excess silicone oil stannous octoate and silicone oil, low foam air content, high closed-cell content.

3. Soft Foam (Decreased hardness at same density)

A. Polyether polyols: low functionality, low hydroxyl value, high molecular weight.

B. Process formulation: insufficient T9 octoate, slow gelation reaction, lower water content with the same amount of tin catalyst, higher amount of physical blowing agents, high dosage of highly active silicone oil, low TDI index.

4. Large Cell Size

A. Poor mixing: uneven mixing, short cream time; increase mixing head speed, reduce mixing head pressure, increase gas injection.

B. Process formulation: silicone oil below lower limit, insufficient or poor quality octoate tin, slow gelation speed.

5. Density Higher than Set Value

A. Polyether polyols: low activity, high molecular weight.

B. Process formulation: silicone oil below lower limit, low TDI index, low foam index.

C. Climate conditions: low temperature, high pressure. A 30% increase in atmospheric pressure increases density by 10-15%.

6. Collapsed Cells and Hollows (Gas evolution rate greater than gelation rate)

A. Polyether polyols: excessive acid value (affects reaction rate), high impurities, low activity, high molecular weight.

B. Process formulation: excess amine, low tin catalyst (rapid foaming and slow gelation), low TDI index, insufficient or ineffective silicone oil.

C. Low-pressure foaming machine: reduce gas injection and mixing head speed.

7. High Closed-Cell Ratio

A. Polyether polyols: high epoxy ethane ratio, high activity, often occurs when switching to polyether polyols with different activity levels.

B. Process formulation: excessive octoate tin, high isocyanate activity, high crosslinking degree, high crosslinking speed, excessive amine and physical blowing agents leading to low foam pressure, high foam elasticity resulting in poor cell opening, excessively high TDI index leading to high closed-cell ratio.

8. Shrinkage (Gelation rate greater than foaming rate)

A. High closed-cell ratio, shrinkage during cooling.

B. Process conditions: low air and material temperature.

C. Process formulation: excessive silicone oil, less amine, more tin, low TDI index.

D. Low-pressure foaming machine: increase mixing head speed, increase gas injection.

9. Cracking

A. "八" shaped cracks indicate excess amine, single line cracks indicate excess water.

B. Mid and bottom cracks: Excessive amine, fast foaming rate (excessive physical blowing agent, poor silicone oil and catalyst quality).

C. Top cracks: Unbalanced gas-evolution gelation rate (low temperature, low material temperature, insufficient catalyst, less amine, poor silicone oil quality).

D. Internal cracks: Low air temperature, high center temperature, low TDI index, excessive tin, high early foaming strength, highly active silicone oil in small quantities.

E. Side middle cracks: Increase tin dosage.

F. Cracking throughout the process may be due to discrepancies in dropping plate and foaming reaction, or premature foaming, or incorrect plates. Apart from formulation, it also relates to the smoothness of the base paper; if the base paper is wrinkled, it can divide the liquid into several parts, causing cracks.

10. Blurred Cell Structure

A. Excessive stirring speed.

B. High air injection volume.

C. Inaccurate metering pump flow.

D. Clogged material pipelines and filters.

11. Bottom Edge Cracks (Excessive amine, fast foaming rate)

Surface large pores: excessive physical blowing agent, poor silicone oil and catalyst quality.

12. Poor Low-Temperature Performance

Poor inherent quality of polyether polyols: low hydroxyl value, low functionality, high unsaturation, low TDI index with the same tin usage.

13. Poor Ventilation

A. Climate conditions: low temperature.

B. Raw materials: high polyether polyol content, highly active silicone oil.

C. Process formulation: excess tin, or low tin and amine content with the same tin usage, high TDI index.

1. Polyether

Polyether, as the main raw material, reacts with isocyanate to form urethane, which is the skeletal reaction of foam products. When the molecular weight increases with the same functionality, the tensile strength, elongation, and resilience of the foam increase, while the reaction activity of similar polyethers decreases. With the same equivalent value (molecular weight/functionality), an increase in functionality accelerates the reaction, increases the cross-linking degree of polyurethane, raises foam hardness, and reduces elongation. The average functionality of polyols should be above 2.5; if it is too low, the recovery of the foam body after compression is poor.

If the amount of polyether used is high, equivalent to a reduction in other materials (TDI, water, catalysts, etc.), it is easy to cause foam products to crack or collapse. If the amount of polyether used is low, the foam product tends to be hard, with reduced elasticity and poor touch.

2. Foaming Agent

Generally, when producing polyurethane blocks with a density greater than 21, only water (chemical foaming agent) is used as the foaming agent. Low-boiling compounds such as methylene chloride (MC) are used as auxiliary foaming agents in low-density formulas or ultra-soft formulas.

Auxiliary foaming agents reduce the density and hardness of the foam. Since they absorb some of the reaction heat, curing is slowed down, requiring an increase in the amount of catalyst. By absorbing heat, the danger of core burning is avoided.

The foaming capacity can be expressed by the foaming index (the number of parts of water or equivalent number of water used for 100 parts of polyether):

IF = m (water) + m (F-11) / 10 + m (MC) / 9 (100 parts of polyether)

Water, as a foaming agent, reacts with isocyanate to form urea bonds and releases a large amount of CO2 and heat. It is a chain-growth reaction. Excess water reduces foam density and increases hardness. However, it also reduces the size and strength of foam pores, reducing their load-bearing capacity, making them prone to collapse or cracking. Increased TDI consumption leads to more heat release and a higher risk of core burning. If the water amount exceeds 5.0 parts, physical foaming agents must be added to absorb some of the heat and prevent core burning. Less water means a corresponding reduction in the amount of catalyst used, but it increases density.

3. Catalyst

Amine: A33 is generally used, which promotes the reaction between isocyanate and water, adjusting foam density, bubble opening rate, etc., mainly promoting foaming reactions.

Too much amine: The foam product cracks, and there are holes or bubbles in the foam; Too little amine: The foam shrinks, closes pores, and the bottom of the foam product becomes thick.

Tin: Typically, Tin(II) octoate (T-9) is used; Tin(IV) oxide (T-19) is a highly active gel reaction catalyst, mainly promoting the gel reaction, i.e., the later stage reaction.

Too much tin: Fast gelation, increased viscosity, poor resilience, poor air permeability, leading to closed-cell phenomenon. Properly increasing its dosage can obtain good open-cell foam plastics with relaxation, further increasing the dosage makes the foam gradually become denser, leading to shrinkage and closed cells.

Too little tin: Insufficient gelation, resulting in cracking during foaming. There may be cracks on the edges or tops, with burrs and poor consolidation. Reducing amine or increasing tin can increase the strength of the polymer foam film when a large amount of gas is generated, thereby reducing hollow or cracking phenomena.

Whether polyurethane foam plastics have an ideal open or closed cell structure mainly depends on whether the gel reaction rate and gas expansion rate are balanced during foam formation. This balance can be achieved by adjusting the types and amounts of tertiary amine catalysts and foam stabilizers in the formula.

4. Foam Stabilizer (Silicone Oil)

Foam stabilizers are a type of surfactant that disperses polyurea well in the foaming system, acting as "physical cross-linking points" and significantly increasing the early viscosity of the foam mixture, preventing cracking. On the one hand, it has an emulsifying effect, enhancing the miscibility between foam material components. On the other hand, the addition of organic silicon surfactants can reduce the liquid's surface tension, reduce the free energy required for gas dispersion, make the dispersed air in the raw materials nucleate more easily during stirring and mixing, facilitate the production of fine bubbles, adjust the size of foam pores, control the foam cell structure, and improve foaming stability. It prevents collapsed or burst bubbles, makes the foam walls elastic, controls the pore size and uniformity of the foam. Generally, the more foaming agent and POP used, the greater the amount of silicone oil used.

High usage: Increases the elasticity of foam walls in the later stage, making them less likely to burst, resulting in smaller pores and closed cells.

Low usage: Foam bursts, collapses after foaming, larger pore size, and easy co-foaming.

5. Temperature Influence

The foaming reaction of polyurethane accelerates with an increase in material temperature, which can pose a risk of core burning and ignition in sensitive formulations. Generally, the temperatures of the polyol and isocyanate components are kept constant. When foaming, the foam density decreases as the temperature of the material increases. With the same formula, if the temperature remains the same but the ambient temperature is high in summer, the reaction speed increases, leading to a decrease in foam density and hardness, an increase in elongation, and an increase in mechanical strength. In summer, the TDI index can be appropriately increased to correct the decrease in hardness.

6. Influence of Air Humidity

With increasing humidity, the isocyanate in the foam reacts with the moisture in the air, causing a decrease in hardness. Therefore, when foaming, the TDI amount can be appropriately increased. Excessive humidity can cause the curing temperature to rise too high, leading to core burning.

7. Influence of Atmospheric Pressure

With the same formula, foaming in high-altitude areas results in lower foam product density.

Polyurethane soft foam plastic is one of the important products in the polyurethane industry. Its production necessarily involves the use of organic amine catalysts, especially organic tertiary amine catalysts. This is because organic tertiary amine catalysts play a significant role in the main reactions of polyurethane foam formation: the reactions of carbon dioxide and molecular polymerization, promoting rapid expansion of reaction mixtures, increased viscosity, and sharp increase in polymer molecular weight. These conditions are essential for the formation of foam bodies, ensuring that soft foam plastics have advantages such as low density, high strength-to-weight ratio, high resilience, and comfort for sitting and lying. There are many types of organic amine catalysts that can be used for polyurethane soft foam plastics. Among them, the highly efficient catalysts recognized by various manufacturers are: triethylene diamine (TDEA) and bis(dimethylaminoethyl) ether (referred to as A1). These are also the most widely used organic amine catalysts in the world today, with the highest consumption among various catalysts.

Due to the molecular structural differences between TDEA and A1 catalysts, there are significant differences in their catalytic performance, particularly in their reactions to carbon dioxide gas and molecular polymerization. If the user does not pay attention to these differences in production, not only will they fail to produce qualified foam products, but it will also be difficult for foam bodies to form. Therefore, understanding and mastering the performance differences between these two catalysts in polyurethane foam production is of great significance. TDEA exists in a solid state under normal conditions, making its application less convenient. In actual production, low molecular weight alcohol compounds are commonly used as solvents, formulated into 33% solutions for ease of use, commonly referred to as A33. On the other hand, A1 is a low-viscosity liquid that can be directly applied. Below is a comparison of the catalytic performance differences between A1 and A33 in the production of polyurethane soft foam plastics.

A33 has a 60% catalytic function for the reaction with carbon dioxide gas and a 40% catalytic function for molecular polymerization. It has a low effective utilization rate of carbon dioxide gas, resulting in lower foaming height and higher foam density. Since most of the catalytic function is used for molecular polymerization reactions, it is easy to produce closed-cell foam bodies, which are stiff with low rebound, and the adjustable range of tin catalysts becomes narrower. To achieve the same catalytic function, the amount used is 33% more than A1. Both the bottom skin and outer skin of the foam body are thicker. Increasing the amount can increase the reaction speed, but the amount of tin catalyst must be reduced accordingly, otherwise closed-cell foam bodies will be produced.

A1 has an 80% catalytic function for the reaction with carbon dioxide gas and a 20% catalytic function for molecular polymerization. It has a high effective utilization rate of carbon dioxide gas, resulting in higher foaming height and lower foam density. Since most of the catalytic function is used for gas generation reactions, it is easy to produce open-cell foam bodies, which are soft with high rebound, and the adjustable range of tin catalysts becomes wider. To achieve the same catalytic function, the amount used is less than A33. Both the bottom skin and outer skin of the foam body are thinner. Increasing the amount can increase the reaction speed, but the amount of tin catalyst must be increased accordingly, otherwise over-foaming and cracking may occur.

In terms of overall performance between TDEA and A1, A1 has a higher comprehensive catalytic performance than triethylene diamine. Its actual application effects are also better, although not as convenient as triethylene diamine in terms of transportation and storage. Currently, the vast majority of mechanical continuous foam production facilities almost exclusively use A1, while all box-type foam production facilities use TDEA. However, this is not absolute. With a clear understanding of the differences between the two and appropriate formulation adjustments, they can be interchangeable and both can produce excellent foam products.

In polyurethane flexible foams, dichloromethane (MC) is often used to adjust the density and hardness of the foam. With a boiling point of only 40.4°C, during foaming, the reaction of water and TDI generates a large amount of heat, causing MC to evaporate into gas, thus expanding the foam body and reducing foam density.

The vaporization of MC consumes a lot of heat, which can affect the foaming process of the foam in some cases. The following two figures show the changes in the maximum foam temperature and the time to reach it after adding different amounts of MC to a specific formula.

From the charts, it can be observed that after adding MC, the maximum foam temperature decreases significantly, and the time to reach the maximum temperature also increases.

These are just changes in data, but how do they manifest during the actual foaming process? To understand this, let's briefly look at the polyurethane reaction process.

The main reaction in polyurethane foaming is the reaction of water and isocyanate to produce carbon dioxide and amine, and the reaction of polyether polyol and isocyanate to produce polyurethane. However, there are many secondary reactions, summarized as reactions generating urethane and reactions generating urea.

Secondary reactions change the molecular structure of the polymer from linear to cross-linked. Due to different reaction conditions and raw materials, the structure of polyurethane can vary greatly. In general, the more secondary reactions, the more complex the cross-linked structure, resulting in increased hardness and improved tear strength. Of course, the resistance to yellowing also improves, but that's another topic. Increasing the foaming index will strengthen secondary reactions.

Having said so much, what does this have to do with MC? Secondary reactions are all endothermic reactions, requiring heat absorption. However, the vaporization of MC also requires a large amount of heat, thus creating a competitive relationship. Adding a large amount of MC will significantly weaken secondary reactions, increasing the proportion of linear structures in the foam, making it softer, and decreasing thermal plasticity.

Even in colder temperatures during winter, attention should be paid to this issue. Properly increasing the water content in the formula to generate more heat helps maintain the physical properties of the foam without significant changes.