For many small-scale enterprises, although the continuous production line of polyurethane flexible foam offers high output, the costs are also very high, and the target market may not require such large quantities. As a result, non-continuous production lines for polyurethane flexible foam have become their preferable choice. The following is an introduction to the non-continuous production line for polyurethane flexible foam:

1. Box Foaming Process Equipment

The box foaming process and equipment have been developed as a new technology to accommodate the needs of small-scale polyurethane foam production facilities. It builds upon laboratory and manual foam production techniques, essentially an upscaled version of laboratory foam methods. This process has gone through three development stages. Initially, all component materials were sequentially weighed and added to a larger container, followed by the addition of TDI. After rapid mixing, the mixture was immediately poured into a large box mold. This method had high labor intensity, emitted high concentrations of toxic gases, and posed significant health risks to operators. Additionally, the splattering of materials during pouring would entrain a large amount of air, leading to the formation of large air bubbles within the foam structure and even causing foam cracking. Furthermore, there was a significant amount of leftover waste, resulting in substantial material waste and high production costs. 

Later on, the process incorporated metering pumps to convey materials to a mixing barrel with an automatically opening bottom. After high-speed mixing, the bottom plate of the mixing barrel would open, and compressed air would swiftly expel the material into the mold for foam expansion. However, this approach suffered from uneven foam pore structures due to the rapid material flow, leading to swirling foam structures and quality issues like crescent-shaped cracks. The third stage of process improvement is the box foaming device that is mostly adopted today. Its fundamental foaming principle is illustrated in Picture

(a) Raw Material Metering and Mixing      (b) Foaming     (c) Foam Rises to Limit Height

1 - Elevatable Material Mixing Barrel; 2 - Assemblable Box Mold; 3 - Floating Box Top Plate; 4 - Foam Body

Picture 1: Schematic Diagram of Box Foaming Principle

The industrial production equipment for box foaming primarily consists of raw material tanks, metering pump units, elevatable mixing barrels, and assemblable wooden box molds. As depicted in the schematic diagram of the box foaming equipment manufactured by Hennecke (Picture 2), the foaming raw materials are stored in tanks and regulated by control devices to attain the required processing temperature range, typically maintained at 23°C ± 3°C. Sequentially, the metering pump injects polyether polyols, catalyst, surfactants, foaming agents, etc., into the mixing barrel for a stirring duration of 30 to 60 minutes. Next, according to the formulation, TDI is introduced, either directly or through an intermediate container with a bottom switch. Immediate mixing follows TDI addition. Depending on the materials and formulation, the stirring speed is usually controlled at 900 to 1000 revolutions per minute (r/min), with a stirring time of 3 to 8 seconds. After stirring, the mixing barrel is swiftly lifted. The lower part of the barrel lacks a bottom and is placed on the mold box's bottom plate upon lowering, utilizing a sealing ring at the barrel's bottom edge to prevent material leakage.

When lifted, the well-mixed slurry can be directly spread and dispersed on the bottom plate of the box mold, allowing natural foam rise. To prevent the formation of a domed surface on the upper part during foaming, an upper mold plate that matches the mold area and allows for upward limit movement is equipped. The mold box primarily comprises rigid wooden panels, with the bottom plate fixed on a movable mold transport carriage. All four side panels are assemblable, featuring quick-opening and closing locking mechanisms. The inner sides of the panels are coated with silicone-based release agents or lined with polyethylene film material to prevent adhesion. After 8 to 10 minutes of forced maturation within the box, the side panels of the mold box are opened, allowing the removal of block-shaped flexible foam. Following an additional 24 hours of maturation, these foam blocks can undergo cutting and other post-processing procedures.

1 - Raw Material Tank; 2 - Metering Pump Unit; 3 - Control Cabinet; 4 - Mixing Barrel with Elevating Device; 5 - Foaming Box; 6 - Foam Finished Product; 7 - Floating Plate

Picture 2: Box Foaming Equipment Manufactured by Hennecke (BFM100/BFM150)

Box foaming process and equipment exhibit characteristics such as simple operation, compact and straightforward equipment structure, low investment, small footprint, and convenient maintenance. These features make it particularly suitable for small enterprises engaged in intermittent production of low-density block foam. However, its drawbacks are also quite evident: lower production efficiency, less favorable production environment, high concentration of emitted toxic gases on-site, necessitating the use of highly effective exhaust and toxic gas purification systems.

To enhance mixing efficiency, some companies have added several vertical and equidistant baffles to the inner walls of the mixing barrel. These baffles, combined with high-speed spiral-type agitators, facilitate high-speed mixing. This approach can to a certain extent reduce laminar flow effects in the mixing liquid and improve mixing efficiency. An example of this is our product, the SAB-BF3302. For the product's appearance and technical specifications, please refer to Picture 3.

Picture 3: Fully Automatic Box Foaming Machine (Sabtech Technology Limited)

This production line comes with both fully automatic computer control and manual control modes. It's suitable for producing flexible polyurethane foam with densities ranging from 10 to 60 kg/cm. Maximum foam output: 180L. Foam height: 1200mm. Mixing power: 7.5kW. Total power: 35kW.

2. Equipment for Open-Cell Foam Preparation

Open-cell polyurethane foam is a functional foam product developed in the 1980s. It possesses a high porosity, a distinct network structure, softness, breathability, and good mechanical strength. It finds wide application as excellent filtration and shock-absorption material in transportation, instrumentation, medical material filtration membranes, and as catalyst carriers in the chemical industry. Filling it into aircraft fuel tanks can suppress oil agitation and reduce the risk of explosions. Impregnating it with ceramic slurry and high-temperature sintering results in a novel open-cell ceramic filter material used in the metallurgical industry.

The preparation of open-cell polyurethane foam involves methods such as steam hydrolysis, alkaline soaking, and explosion. In industrial production, the explosion method is predominantly used. Initially, polyurethane foam of a specific pore size is prepared using the box foaming process. Subsequently, it's placed in dedicated explosion network equipment, filled with explosive gas, and ignited after completely filling the foam body. By utilizing the impact energy and high-temperature heat generated by the explosion parameters, the cell walls of the polyurethane foam are ruptured and fused onto the cell walls, forming a distinct network structure, as shown in Picture 4.

Picture 4: Clearly Networked Open-Cell Foam

Methods like steam hydrolysis or alkaline soaking are used to prepare open-cell foam. However, there are issues of low efficiency, poor quality, and environmental pollution with these methods. They are mainly employed for small-scale production such as laboratory sample testing. Large-scale production primarily uses the explosion method.

ATL Schubs GmbH, a German company, specializes in the research and development of polyurethane reticulated foam and manufactures the ReticulatusTM foam explosion machinery. The explosion chamber of the reticulated foam explosion equipment comes in two forms: cylindrical and rectangular. The former is suitable for cylindrical foam, while the latter is more versatile. It can be used not only for square foam but also for processing reticulated foam from cylindrical foam, as shown in Picture 5. The explosion chamber is constructed from high-quality 100mm-thick steel plates. Operation is controlled by a computer modem, offering features like automatic opening and closing, automatic locking, automatic operation, and automatic alerts. Additionally, remote program design and modification can be facilitated through data transmission sensors.

Picture 5: Polyurethane Foam Reticulation Processing Equipment (ATL Schubs)

During production, foam bodies measuring 3 to 6 meters in length that are intended for reticulation are pushed into the explosion chamber. The chamber's door is closed hydraulically, and the air inside the chamber is evacuated using a vacuum pump. Under computer control, a precise proportion of oxygen and hydrogen gases is introduced, and the gas mixture's ratio is mechanically adjusted based on factors such as foam sample type and network size requirements. 

Sensors continuously monitor the process, ensuring that all process parameters are within the specified conditions before controlled detonation is initiated. The explosive force and flame intensity generated by the explosion penetrate through the entire foam body, creating a distinct network structure. After forming, the foam body is cooled, residual materials and waste gases are purged using nitrogen, and the pressure chamber can then be opened to retrieve the reticulated foam. The entire process takes approximately 8 to 10 minutes. The pore diameter of the reticulated foam falls within the range of 10 to 100 pores per inch (ppi) (Note: ppi refers to the number of pores within one inch).

The above provides some insight into the non-continuous production process of polyurethane flexible foam. I hope this information proves helpful to you.

When using a batch foam machine for polyurethane soft foam foaming, have you encountered the following situations?

1.Uneven and numerous foam pores,

2. Rough foam texture.

3. Chaotic pore sizes across the entire foam surface, with slight signs of large pores.

Issues like these are quite common. The main reason for the first issue is that the distance between the mixing impeller of the foam machine and the bottom of the mixing barrel is too great; the second issue is that the mixing blades are too short and narrow: the third issue is that the angle of the mixing blades is too large.

Many manufacturers who design and produce foam machines only understand the principles during the design process, without understanding the significant relationship between a different design in foam production and product quality. A reasonable and perfect mechanical design can only be gradually improved in actual work, and only experienced foamers can achieve this.

Here are some experiences we have had with machine modifications and upgrades, hoping they will be helpful:

First, the installation position of the mixing wheel should be as low as possible, closer to the bottom of the mixing barrel is better. In general, the distance between the lowest point of the mixing blade and the bottom of the mixing barrel should be around two centimeters

Second, the shape of the mixing blade should be fan-shaped, with a moderately wide edge. The advantage of being wide is that it increases the contact area with the liquid material, providing sufficient power and also balances the liquid material.

Third, the length of the mixing blade should also be as long as possible, leaving about three to four centimeters from the baffle inside the mixing barrel.

Fourth, the two edges of the mixing blade should be sloped, with the angle of inclination based on the width of one end and two centimeters difference on both sides. After the mixing blade is modified, proper operation is also crucial, especially the mixing speed. Most batch foam machines nowadays are equipped with high-speed timing frequency conversion devices. However, in actual production, this device is often unnecessary. The operating speed mainly depends on the amount of material in the mixing barrel. If there is a lot of material, the speed should be appropriately faster, and if there is less material, then the speed should be lower.

1. Core Scorching (Center temperature exceeding material's oxidation temperature)

A. Poor quality polyether polyols: excessive moisture, high peroxide content, high boiling point impurities, elevated metal ion concentration, improper use of antioxidants.

B. Formulation issues: high TDI index in low-density formulas, improper ratio of water to physical blowing agents, insufficient physical blowing agent, excessive water.

C. Climate impact: high summer temperatures, slow heat dissipation, high material temperatures, high humidity leading to center temperature surpassing oxidation temperature.

D. Improper storage: Increased TDI index leading to accumulation of heat during post-curing, resulting in elevated internal temperature and core scorching.

2. Large Compression Deformation

A. Polyether Polyol: Functionality less than 2.5, propylene oxide ratio greater than 8%, high proportion of low molecular weight components, unsaturation greater than 0.05 mol/kg.

B. Process Conditions: The reaction center temperature is too low or too high, poor post-curing, incomplete reaction, or partial scorching.

C. Process Formula: TDI index too low (controlled within 105-108), excess silicone oil stannous octoate and silicone oil, low foam air content, high closed-cell content.

3. Soft Foam (Decreased hardness at same density)

A. Polyether polyols: low functionality, low hydroxyl value, high molecular weight.

B. Process formulation: insufficient T9 octoate, slow gelation reaction, lower water content with the same amount of tin catalyst, higher amount of physical blowing agents, high dosage of highly active silicone oil, low TDI index.

4. Large Cell Size

A. Poor mixing: uneven mixing, short cream time; increase mixing head speed, reduce mixing head pressure, increase gas injection.

B. Process formulation: silicone oil below lower limit, insufficient or poor quality octoate tin, slow gelation speed.

5. Density Higher than Set Value

A. Polyether polyols: low activity, high molecular weight.

B. Process formulation: silicone oil below lower limit, low TDI index, low foam index.

C. Climate conditions: low temperature, high pressure. A 30% increase in atmospheric pressure increases density by 10-15%.

6. Collapsed Cells and Hollows (Gas evolution rate greater than gelation rate)

A. Polyether polyols: excessive acid value (affects reaction rate), high impurities, low activity, high molecular weight.

B. Process formulation: excess amine, low tin catalyst (rapid foaming and slow gelation), low TDI index, insufficient or ineffective silicone oil.

C. Low-pressure foaming machine: reduce gas injection and mixing head speed.

7. High Closed-Cell Ratio

A. Polyether polyols: high epoxy ethane ratio, high activity, often occurs when switching to polyether polyols with different activity levels.

B. Process formulation: excessive octoate tin, high isocyanate activity, high crosslinking degree, high crosslinking speed, excessive amine and physical blowing agents leading to low foam pressure, high foam elasticity resulting in poor cell opening, excessively high TDI index leading to high closed-cell ratio.

8. Shrinkage (Gelation rate greater than foaming rate)

A. High closed-cell ratio, shrinkage during cooling.

B. Process conditions: low air and material temperature.

C. Process formulation: excessive silicone oil, less amine, more tin, low TDI index.

D. Low-pressure foaming machine: increase mixing head speed, increase gas injection.

9. Cracking

A. "八" shaped cracks indicate excess amine, single line cracks indicate excess water.

B. Mid and bottom cracks: Excessive amine, fast foaming rate (excessive physical blowing agent, poor silicone oil and catalyst quality).

C. Top cracks: Unbalanced gas-evolution gelation rate (low temperature, low material temperature, insufficient catalyst, less amine, poor silicone oil quality).

D. Internal cracks: Low air temperature, high center temperature, low TDI index, excessive tin, high early foaming strength, highly active silicone oil in small quantities.

E. Side middle cracks: Increase tin dosage.

F. Cracking throughout the process may be due to discrepancies in dropping plate and foaming reaction, or premature foaming, or incorrect plates. Apart from formulation, it also relates to the smoothness of the base paper; if the base paper is wrinkled, it can divide the liquid into several parts, causing cracks.

10. Blurred Cell Structure

A. Excessive stirring speed.

B. High air injection volume.

C. Inaccurate metering pump flow.

D. Clogged material pipelines and filters.

11. Bottom Edge Cracks (Excessive amine, fast foaming rate)

Surface large pores: excessive physical blowing agent, poor silicone oil and catalyst quality.

12. Poor Low-Temperature Performance

Poor inherent quality of polyether polyols: low hydroxyl value, low functionality, high unsaturation, low TDI index with the same tin usage.

13. Poor Ventilation

A. Climate conditions: low temperature.

B. Raw materials: high polyether polyol content, highly active silicone oil.

C. Process formulation: excess tin, or low tin and amine content with the same tin usage, high TDI index.

Flame-retardant PU flexible foam, also known as fireproof PU flexible foam, is generally a fireproof material synthesized by adding flame retardants to various polyurethane materials.

Function of flame retardants: They can absorb heat and decompose into non-combustible substances at or near the ignition temperature; they can react with the combustion products of the PU flexible foam to produce difficult-to-burn substances, thereby delaying combustion and allowing the ignition point to self-extinguish.

Common flame retardants: Bromine-based flame retardants, chlorine-based flame retardants, phosphorus-based flame retardants, and inorganic flame retardants.

Flame Retardant Grade and Testing for PU flexible foam

Flame retardant grade refers to the obvious property that a substance has or a material exhibits after treatment, which significantly delays the spread of flames.

Flame retardant testing:

HB: The lowest flame retardant grade in the UL94 standard. It requires that for samples 3 to 13 millimeters thick, the burning rate is less than 40 millimeters per minute; for samples less than 3 millimeters thick, the burning rate is less than 70 millimeters per minute; or extinguished before reaching the 100-millimeter mark.

V-2: After two 10-second combustion tests on the sample, the flame is extinguished within 60 seconds. Combustible material may drop.

V-1: After two 10-second combustion tests on the sample, the flame is extinguished within 60 seconds. There should be no combustible material dropping.

V-0: After two 10-second combustion tests on the sample, the flame is extinguished within 30 seconds. There should be no combustible material dropping.